Books : Story of O


now Order Gay & Lesbian and cheap underwear set - and find best 36 and cheapest garter belt !

Books : Story of O


  

Story of O

by: Pauline Reage




Your Price: $7.99
Prices subject to change.


Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours



Binding: Paperback
Dewey Decimal Number: 843.912
EAN: 9780345301116
ISBN: 0345301110
Label: Ballantine Books
Manufacturer: Ballantine Books
Number Of Items: 1
Number Of Pages: 204
Publication Date: January 01, 1992
Publisher: Ballantine Books
Release Date: May 12, 1981
Studio: Ballantine Books



Editorial Review:

Product Description:
The classic erotic novel, THE STORY OF O relates the love of a beautiful Parisian fashion photographer for Rene. As part of that intense love, she demands debasement and severe sexual and pychological tests. It is a unique work not to be missed.









Related Items:
     see more









Customer Reviews
Average Rating:  out of 5 stars

Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Liberated Me from my Guilt over Wanting to Hurt Women
This is perhaps the best book I've ever read. For years I have had fantasies of torturing and abusing women. I used to feel guilty about this. But after reading this masterpiece, I now realize that women actually want to be tortured and abused, even if they cry and resist at first. It must be something inherent to the entire gender, I guess? Anyways, the good news is I no longer feel guilty. Thanks, Pauline Reage! You've changed my life.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Where deSade left off ...
"O" takes us on a journey through the darkest parts of the female sexual beast: her hunger, her lust, and her desire to connect with her darker hidden self through the flesh of another.

From a woman's point of view "O" takes strides into the private spaces of a woman's mind, spaces even most modern women will not dare to go.

This story has an eerie depth to it. Filled with horrific torture, and yet, what is done to the body pales in comparison to what an obsessive love can do to the mind in this groundbreaking epic of erotic fiction. "O" is not simply a physical masochist, seeking pleasure in the pain her body feels, she is a submissive and an emotional masochist ... her desire for pain deeply embedded into her psyche, much like the main character in Masoch's Venus in Furs.

Love for "O" must be a torture all encompassing in its magnitude, and for that to be, one must surrender everything: mind, body, and soul.

A brilliant work.




Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Is it hot in here?
Maybe not for everyone, but this is one incredible story. Anyone interested in dominance and submission must read this.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - At once erotic, discomforting, and psychological, O's story is wonderful and thought provoking. Very highly recommended
For love for her lover René, a young woman called O consents to be bound, humiliated, beaten and abused, marked, and prostituted. Trained at the château Roissy, graduated into her lover's personal care, and then gifted by René to an even more dominant master, O journeys through slavery--at first happy only to please her lover, O eventually becomes proud of her identity as a willing slave. Balancing scenes of O's slavery with introspection into O's evolving thought, desire, and motivation, The Story of O is at once erotic, discomforting, and psychological. I was deeply impressed by the balance between these factors, and found the book thought provoking and all together wonderful. Very highly recommended.

It's difficult to critique the actual text of a translated work because the author's words are necessarily rewritten by the translator. The minor euphemism in the language (like "back entrance" for anus) sometimes feel weak, as if the writer lacks confidence. But for both of these defects, the book reads as swift and as slick as water. Cutting backstory to a minimum and never apologizing for the content, Réage approaches her topic boldly. At only 200 pages, the book moves swiftly through the different phases of O's training and her life as a slave, and these episodes are rarely repetitive but instead evolve into different forms of service, ownership, and punishment. Quickly intriguing and entirely engrossing, this is a difficult book to put down.

The novel is formed from a tripartite of elements: the erotic, the discomforting, and the psychological. The narrative voice of O's submission maintains a certain distance and is almost cold. As a result, like O, taught to keep her mouth open and her knees apart, the text is open and bare--and this naked honesty achieves an excruciating eroticism. The details of O's slavery, her beating and her prostitution, push the boundaries of generally accepted sexuality and are discomforting even as they are arousing. And weaving constantly into both the erotic and the discomforting are explorations of O's mental state. As O's servitude evolves, so does her mind. Initially, O consents to slavery at the behest of her lover, and find joy only in her lover's approval of her submission. However, as she continues down her chosen path and her relationship with René changes, O becomes increasingly proud of her role as a willing slave.

It is this introspection that gives the book depth and makes it truly wonderful: not just erotic, The Story of O is also psychological, an exploration of one woman's choice to become a slave. O's submissive role is not innate, it is learned. She becomes content. She discovers pride in her own debasement. O's story of submission is her own, and in Réage's voice is unapologetic--not all readers may agree with what O does. But O's motivations are real, as is the growth that she goes through as she continues along the path that she has chosen. It is rare to see a book that can so fully consume and combine both the body and the mind, but The Story of O does this precisely--for O, and perhaps also for the reader. The short book is quickly over, but it will remain in the reader's thoughts for a long time after as he comprehends and judges O's life. I expect that I will reread this book, and so I'm happy that I bought it. It is a brilliant example of its type--the philosophical erotic novel--and I very highly recommend it to all readers.

(On a side note: my biggest complaint about this book lies outside of the text itself, but rather with the mystery that surrounds it: the identities of the long-unknown author, the publishing editor, and this translator, as well as the editor's two-line conclusion to the book. Some online searches on The Story of O help clear up this mystery, but on the whole I find it only distracts from the book. I wish I had--and I recommend that other readers do--skip the various introductions to the Ballantine edition and concentrate instead on the text of the novel itself.)



Rating: 1 out of 5 stars - Simply Painful
Years ago I read a Vanity Fair article about this new "hot" book - One Hundred Strokes of the Brush Before Bed by Melissa P - a supposedly true story of the sexual awakening of a 15 year old Italian girl. While searching for it online I read a review which recommended The Story of O instead as real erotica. Intrigued - especially since I had, of course, heard of Story of O as a "classic" and a somewhat naughty book with an infamous reputation - not unlike another French novel I love, Lolita, I also purchased Reage.

I could never put my finger on exactly what bothered me about the book. I found nothing of interest and found myself only and solely frustrated with this doormat of a "heroine." How could someone subject themselves to being treated as such an object, a possession of another person? How could anyone find anything erotic in tales of a woman being tortured? What kind of man is O's lover, who would require her to be treated as such? What kind of man would take pleasure from the pain of his supposed beloved?

I spent a lot of time studying the book - learning the history behing its inception and the controversy around its publication - and all the treatises written on feminist themes in the book - all of which I rejected. After all, isn't the first tenet of feminism being the equality between the sexes, not the subjugation of one to another

I reject O and the book as relevant and erotic because it underscores the problems that still exist with women today. So many subscribe to the blind follower theory of love - they become nothing but vessels into which a man can pour his own desires, his own needs while she refuses to name any of her own. She nods her assent to every one of his requests and fears asking of him for fear he'll leave her. She "proves" her love by refusing to exist as her own person, instead trying to bind him to her by being sacrificial. But who can love what they do not respect and how can any man respect a woman who says, "Yes, hurt me in any way you wish and I'll do nothing but ask for more and smile with love towards you?"

I don't care at all for the S&M of the novel - perhaps my disinterest in such a thing strips the novel of any possible eroticism for me. But I can even understand how a little pain might be erotic - even Phoebe on "Friends" enjoys some "gentle spanking." But to put one's self into that level of depravity marks a person with such a truncated sense of self that they don't value themselves enough to reject being used and abused.

Outside of that, the prose is plodding and boring. It lacks depth and creativity. Judging against other erotica, it lacks any soul. It is a recitation of abuses without any context. We never find out why O is so flawed, why she would subject herself to such abuse. At least in Lolita you understand Humbert's flaws, which makes him a full fledged person and more than a cliche. O, however, flounders under disection. The plot lacks any theme and any connective tissue. The ending, as all scholars agree, is tacked on - revealing the fact that it was never to be published at all.

I think the book's fame is derived more from its controversy than its quality. If it weren't for the "who wrote it" mystery, there'd be little to recommend it as a book for the ages.




 





Bondage  Chemises, Teddies & Negligees  Condoms  Corsets, Bustiers & Garter Belts  Erotic Fiction  Erotic Massage  Erotic Photography  French Erotica  Gay & Lesbian  General DVDs  Independent Videos  Lingerie Sets  Lubricants  Men's Enhancers  Men's Magazines  Photographers  Sex Games  Sex Instruction Books  Sex Instruction DVDs  Sex Toys  Sexuality DVDs  Sexuality in Literature  Spermicides  Victorian Erotica  Women's Enhancers 




Indian exporters of essential foods to Sri Lanka may be hit hard if importers and distributors in the island carry out a threat to go on strike against the Sri Lankan government's bid to enter the trade on unequal terms.

The exercise will cost RBI around Rs 100 cr. Under the terms of the contract, HCL will set up the two centres and maintain them for the RBI for 7 years. Build your biz online





Crazy Thumbs   Cum Swapping   Oral Live Sex   Wet Oral Sex   Swallowing Cum   Babes   Anal Sex
Throatjobs   Throat Gagging   Deep Throating Cocks  


$18.99



Set in Saudi Arabia, The Kingdom is a political action thriller with good acting and wonderful visuals. Its so-so script, though, at times meanders aimlessly until a good explosion jolts the viewer's attention back to the screen. Jamie Foxx stars as FBI special agent Ronald Fleury, who leads an elite team into Saudi Arabia to find the terrorists who attacked American employees working in the Middle East. He has been given the unlikely deadline of five days to infiltrate the compound, with just his wit and his crew, which includes forensics expert Janet Mayes (Jennifer Garner), explosives guru Grant Sykes (Chris Cooper), and intelligence analyst Adam Leavitt (Jason Bateman). It's unclear how helpful smarmy U.S. diplomat Damon Schmidt (Jeremy Piven) will be, but Fleury knows enough to surmise that the media-hungry Schmidt might not be completely trustworthy. Foxx and Garner have wonderful screen presence, but it's Bateman and Piven who get the best lines. Director Peter Berg peppers The Kingdom with actors he has worked with in the past. Berg, who guest-starred on Alias opposite Garner, casts Tim McGraw in a small role here. (The country singer also had a co-starring role in Berg's 2004 film Friday Night Lights.) And Kyle Chandler and Minka Kelly--two of Berg's lead actors from the Friday Night Lights television series, , make appearances in The Kingdom. The action sequences he creates are impressive and generate a sense of panic that The Kingdom producer Michael Mann (Miami Vice) undoubtedly applauds. While a tauter script would've rounded out the action nicely, the action in many cases does speak for itself. --Jae-Ha Kim
$19.99



A staggering portrait of arrogance and incompetence, the documentary No End in Sight avoids the question of why the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003, choosing instead to focus on the war's aftermath--and meticulously examine the chain of decisions that led Iraq into a grotesque state of lawlessness and civil war. Drawing from interviews with top generals, administration officials, journalists, and soldiers who were in the thick of the war itself, No End in Sight lays out a gripping story, as suspenseful as any Hollywood movie, accompanied by terrifying footage of firefights and explosions more vivid than any special effects. Unfortunately, there is no happy ending. If the documentary has a weakness, it's the shortage of voices trying to defend the administration policies (perhaps unsurprisingly, policymakers like Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz declined to be interviewed). But the testimony (presented by administration insiders and officials in Iraq, both military and civilian) argues that, despite contrary analysis and experienced advice against its actions, the top brass of the Bush administration made decisions (that aggravated already existing problems and created devastating new ones. No End in Sight builds its case one voice at a time and avoids the grandstanding that undercuts Michael Moore's work; instead, the gradual accumulation of simple facts--presented with weary resignation, earnest outrage, and restrained anger--results in a compelling condemnation of one of the worst blunders the U.S. has ever made. --Bret Fetzer
$14.99



Fans of Oliver Stone's J.F.K. will recognize the opening moments of writer-director Eugene Jarecki's Why We Fight, in which outgoing President Dwight Eisenhower warns of the pernicious and growing influence of what he called the "military-industrial complex." But Stone's movie, which uses the same footage, was a work of fiction. While those who disagree with the decidedly leftist point of view in this documentary will probably consider it the product of paranoid liberal fantasy as well, there's enough credible material, much of it supplied by the targets of Jarecki's criticisms, to make Eisenhower look like a prophet and everyone else uneasy about the dark confluence of politics, money, and war that controls the country's fortunes. The message here is that while there may be some who sincerely believe that America's various military engagements (in Iraq, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, and elsewhere) since World War II are the product of our God-given duty to spread freedom and halt the influence of evil ideologies around the world, the real reason we fight is that war is good business. This is hardly a bulletin; anyone who is surprised by allegations that politicians pander to defense contractors, or that Vice President Dick Cheney helped secure huge deals for Halliburton, the company he formerly headed, simply hasn't been paying attention (Politicians lie? How shocking!). In fact, the principal drawback to Jarecki's film is simply that there's nothing particularly revelatory or compelling about it. Only when he takes a personal approach does he go beyond the obvious; the story of a retired New York policeman and former Vietnam veteran whose son died in the World Trade Center, who wanted revenge, but who became seriously disillusioned when Bush admitted that the war in Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, adds some much needed human interest. Still, Why We Fight, which includes a director's audio commentary track and a few other bonus features, serves as a grim reminder that the world's most powerful nation has strayed far from the principles of our founding fathers, a development that does not bode well for America's future. --Sam Graham

by Dixie Chicks
$21.95

Average customer rating: ISBN: 0739043439

by Dixie Chicks, Mark Seliger
$16.95

Average customer rating: ISBN: 0739043447
$4.95



In her snowy home state of Utah, Marie Osmond serves up a warm cup of holiday cheer with Marie Osmond's Merry Christmas, her very first Christmas special. Mixing traditional songs and carols with modern melodies, Marie presents a sentimental hourlong program (originally aired on television in 1989), blending music with short sketches. The show features Kirk Cameron, then-teen heartthrob on Growing Pains; Candace Cameron, his sister and star of Full House; country singer Lee Greenwood; Sally Struthers and daughter Samantha, ice dancers Judy Blumberg and Michael Siebert, and the Osmond Boys.

Marie opens the show with an outdoor rendition of "We Need a Little Christmas" and then moves into the studio where Kirk Cameron arrives on a snowmobile (fresh from rescuing a trio of blonde snow bunnies) to read "The First Christmas Story." Lee Greenwood performs "Christmas to Christmas" and later a duet with Marie. "It's Beginning to Look a Lot Like Christmas" is sung by Sally Struthers and daughter with help from the Osmond Boys--six stepping stones ages 4 to 12 who have the senior Osmonds' moves down pat. The adorable award, though, goes to Marie's 5-year-old son, Steven, who performs a rockin' version of "Santa Claus Is Comin' to Town" (clapping on the off-beat nearly the whole song).

Marie has a good, strong voice, but many of the songs are overproduced and melodramatic. This, most likely, is a product of the big, pouffy '80s (her hair and outfits are also bigger-than-life) rather than a reflection of her talents. The closing number, "O Holy Night," sung by Marie alone, is quite lovely. --Dana Van Nest

$11.98






Shopping  Created at Fri Dec 5 18:44:32 2008