DVD : Zoo (Widescreen)


now Order Victorian Erotica and cheap hot sexy fashions - and find best body suit and cheapest movie database !

DVD : Zoo (Widescreen)


  

Zoo (Widescreen)

starring: John Paulsen, Ken Kreps, Richard Carmen, Susan M. Carr, James Chu
directed by: Robinson Devor




List Price: $27.98
Your Price: $24.99
You Save: $2.99 (11%)
Prices subject to change.


Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours



Aspect Ratio: 1.78:1
Audience Rating: Unrated
Binding: DVD
Brand: Image Entertainment
EAN: 0821575552653
Format: Color, Dolby, DVD-Video, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC
Label: Velocity / Thinkfilm
Manufacturer: Velocity / Thinkfilm
Number Of Items: 1
Publisher: Velocity / Thinkfilm
Region Code: 1
Release Date: September 18, 2007
Running Time: 76 minutes
Studio: Velocity / Thinkfilm
Theatrical Release Date: 2007



Editorial Review:

Product Description:
An extraordinary glimpse into the life of a seemingly normal seattle family man whose secret sexual appetites lead to his shocking death. This explores the enxuing media coverage & public outcry that uncovered a secret community of zoophiles who call themselves zoos. Studio: Image Entertainment Release Date: 09/18/2007 Run time: 76 minutes









Related Items:
     see more









Customer Reviews
Average Rating:  out of 5 stars

Rating: 1 out of 5 stars - Unwatchable
Um, I purchased this video to see if I can understand what drove Kenneth Pinyan to his "hobby" and ultimate end. I got no insite from the film.

The script is non-existant, the camera work is basic, acting is amature, no video editing skill evident, the sound quality is sub-par. Only was able to watch it for about 10min.

I think it's film award was a creul prank.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - More
Not for everybody but Interesting and Appealing. I could see why someone would do this. Would like to view the original filmed videos anybody know where one might get them?



Rating: 3 out of 5 stars - An interesting case on a subject that is not oft heard of
I guess buying all those other documentaries has ultimately led me down this path. I do quite enjoy documentaries, particularly about nature, history, and astrophysics... then there's this one. When this first hit my recommendation list I initially thought it was something about zoos or animals, just goes to show my general naiveté on this topic. Of course I read the description, and sometimes it's hard to be a curious fellow, but I really wanted to see what this was all about regardless of ratings. I confess that the general topic of bestiality is something that interests me, but particularly from a psychological level. I've read a few other books on aberrant sexual behavior, probably one of the most well known is "The 120 Days of Sodom" and while this is not a scientific book, it does have a great deal to read into and think about without the bias of some scientists. I've also read "Rogue Messiah" which relates extreme religious cults with a penchant for outrageous overpowered sexual behavior. I guess I'm saying this because I don't want to be labeled as something I'm not and pointing out that the subject in general is something that interests me.

That being said, I was rather disappointed in the documentary. I had never heard of this case until I stumbled upon this film and I think it's presented in a way that requires people to have a decent amount of foreknowledge about the case. For someone like me it felt kind of disjointed and I really don't like the way it's been kind of thrown together. I would've preferred a solid fifteen minute introduction into what prompted this documentary, going over the case and news etc. However, they don't do that, instead they stick to this clandestine ominous feel throughout the documentary with a strange soundtrack that lends to this feeling. Something is going on? Something very abnormal by society's standards... what could it be? This is how it feels to watch this. Towards the end I learned what happened and I think I know why they filmed it this way. Basically it feels like this film tries to engender sympathy for the Zoo's that were chastised for their involvement even though Mr. Hands, who died, was fully consenting to what he did with the horses.

While I think they failed on all fronts to make me want to go hang out with these fellows and be friends, I am glad it gave the subject neutral treatment overall. I have actually gone to further lengths to peruse some forums that cater to this kind of interest, for as the documentary points out, the internet is what brought everyone together. Anyway, one thing struck me as I was reading through the forum; there are many that take this as a sexual orientation. I have to be honest, this never occurred to me before. I always considered that it followed down a path of fetishism, which is something I can identify with a little more. But in that form the objects or actions are what a person responds to, a lot of these people speak of love as if to a regular human mate. Personally, I'm neutral on this subject, to be perfectly frank. I don't care if you think it's sick or disgusting, many people say this about homosexuality or transvestites.

Based on a lot of things I've read and seen, I cannot deny the overwhelming motivator that is gratification of this sort. I have to try and see this documentary for what it is and try to see things from the world view of these people if I can ever hope to grasp some concept, and I have to question myself. If this was the only way I could ever actually have real pleasure in this world would it be worth the risk? Sure, you'll naturally go through motions of trying out the normal stuff society deems acceptable, but what if that's not enough and you keep searching. Eventually you end up in a very lonely state and the need builds up until you have to follow through. It's not necessarily insanity, it's just that you know what you need is out there and it's in your power to obtain it and perhaps share in that lovingly. So at that point you just weigh the risk. Is it better to be shunned by society for something that makes you feel loved or not? While I'm not about to go track down a local barnyard personally, I do understand to a degree, because even desires that may be considered tame are still shunned by society. Even bondage, which has become more readily practiced today, is still considered, by and large, an abnormality by the greater populace. Many people shun this, but as the concept becomes more and more mentioned people become desensitized to the subject. I'm not a psychologist, but as others have mentioned, I wish they would have included some commentary from one on this documentary, because I would really like to know the answer to "is this a legitimate sexual orientation?" Society will yell a resounding "no!" and the Zoo's may yell a resounding "yes!" I have to admit, society can be wrong, it was wrong that the world was flat now wasn't it?

I know I went off tangent, but I couldn't help it, this documentary leaves way too many questions. Sure I know what happened about the case. I now know there is an animal abuse law on the books in Washington, in case this should happen again. But what I don't know is what really makes the human tick on this level. I don't care if you think it's wrong, or immoral, people are doing it. People are not only doing it, they are finding it a great pleasure and do it without regret. They take great care of their animals and love them dearly as you or I would love a spouse or a child, as the film states. I still want to hear some theories on why! But no one ever asked them that question, no one even tries to speculate here. It did get an extra half star for staying neutral on the topic and not condemning the people, instant condemnation doesn't necessarily give you honest answers and I doubt these people would've allowed themselves to be interviewed if they were being demonized. For that I have nothing but respect for the makers of this.



Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - Beyond Comprehension
I thought this documentary was quite well done. It was hard to watch at times, as they do show some quick flash footage shots from the actual death video (the audio was more difficult to endure...had to fast forward thru that...not for the squeamish). Like most people, when I heard the news of Ken Pinyan's death, I was disgusted, astounded, shocked, and saddened. Zoophilia is such a taboo subject, and how someone can take the love of animals to such a horrific extreme is impossible for me to understand. The film makers do make an effort to explore zoophilia from the perspectives of those intimately involved in this case (Pinyan's cronies).

There is a poignant interview in the middle of the movie with one of the actors who portrays a cop in the film. He talks about the tragedy that Pinyan bled to death, and we should not forget that he was a father and had a young son. It's hard to imagine being such a slave to those kind of desires, but the interviews with Pinyan's friends did help shed some light.



Rating: 3 out of 5 stars - More David Lynch than Michael Moore
Many people were probably very angry upon reaching the end of Zoo when they realized that they had not just watched a documentary, they had watched an art house film deceptively packaged as a documentary. Zoo eschews all standards of documentary filming such as factual content or video interviews, and instead strives to amaze viewers with flashy cinematography, a haunting musical score, and existential self-referential segments that have little or no connection with the subject matter of the documentary. The potential audience for this film should be warned ahead of time that it provides few solid facts about the events in question, sheds no new light on the subject of bestiality, and fails to provide any insight into why human beings would choose to make love with animals.

Zoo is nominally about the events leading up to Kenneth Pinyan's death due to a perforated colon when he engaged in anal intercourse with an Arabian stallion on videotape, as well as the individuals in Pinyan's life who encouraged or were at least indifferent to his interest in bestiality. The word "nominally" may be giving Zoo too much credit, as it never even provides Pinyan's name, instead solely using his online moniker "Mr. Hands". None of the individuals associated with Pinyan, from the group of people who identify themselves as living the zoo lifestyle that he met with regularly to engage in acts of bestiality, to his ex-wife and child, or even the police and prosecutors involved in the aftermath of his death, are ever shown on screen. Director Robinson Devor choose to use actors to create reenactments of events coupled with the occasional voiceover from audio interviews with a scant few people willing to talk about the issue. These audio tracks and reenactments do not even constitute the bulk of the film, which would have been acceptable if they gave any decent information. The vast majority of Zoo is simply long trailing shots of scenery or people matched with odd color schemes or eerie music. If these non-essential segments were all edited out, Zoo's runtime would be cut down from 80 minutes to somewhere around 30 minutes. There is no denying that Devor has a great talent for camera work and editing, but his talent is not suited to making documentaries.

Devor is so obsessed with producing a specific mood and theme, to the complete detriment of the "plot", that he might as well be directing an Italian giallo. Halfway through the film the actor who portrays a police officer is shown in front of an entirely white background while he talks about his reaction to being asked to act in the film that he is currently acting in. Occasionally throughout this monologue the screen flashes black, leaving a white ghost trail of the actor's silhouette. This sort of ploy crosses the line from artsy to self indulgent, especially considering that the monologue has only the most tenuous of connections to Pinyan or the zoo lifestyle. Perhaps Devor was trying to show that a subject as bizarre as animal love and the men who would risk potential death to take part in it could not successfully be explained by a straight forward exposition of events, but instead required a broader look at people and their environments in general that requires multiple viewings to really sink in.

Looking for an avant garde or artsy film to blow your mind with odd camera angles and off the wall color schemes? Look no further than Zoo. Those who actually wanted to learn something about Kenneth Pinyan or the mindset of people who would engage in such deviant acts can pass on this one.




 





Bondage  Chemises, Teddies & Negligees  Condoms  Corsets, Bustiers & Garter Belts  Erotic Fiction  Erotic Massage  Erotic Photography  French Erotica  Gay & Lesbian  General DVDs  Independent Videos  Lingerie Sets  Lubricants  Men's Enhancers  Men's Magazines  Photographers  Sex Games  Sex Instruction Books  Sex Instruction DVDs  Sex Toys  Sexuality DVDs  Sexuality in Literature  Spermicides  Victorian Erotica  Women's Enhancers 




The HP Compaq tc4400 convertible tablet offers decent performance and battery life, though we recommend adding more RAM.


Small and light enough for a shirt pocket, Samsung's Helix YX-M1 is a one-stop audio entertainment center with an XM radio, a digital music player, and room for 50 hours of tunes, but it comes up short on battery life.




Crazy Thumbs   Cum Swapping   Oral Live Sex   Wet Oral Sex   Swallowing Cum   Babes   Anal Sex
Throatjobs   Throat Gagging   Deep Throating Cocks  


$10.49



A cheerfully over-the-top action film, Bad Boys is notable chiefly for the rapport between its two stars, Will Smith and Martin Lawrence, as two Miami cops on the trail of a drug kingpin as they try to protect a witness (Tea Leoni). Smith is the swinging bachelor and Lawrence the family man, and both must juggle their personal lives as they baby-sit the one chance they have to recover a stolen drug shipment, save their jobs, and take down the drug dealer. While the film is almost always implausible and its story is something seen many times before, director Michael Bay (The Rock) keeps things moving stylishly and at a feverish pace, as Smith and Lawrence prove themselves a terrific comic pairing. Their odd couple banter flies at a faster clip than the bullets and explosions, and becomes the best reason to see this hyperbolic but entertaining action flick. --Robert Lane
$9.99



Peter Berg's dark comedy about a bachelor party gone horribly awry is highly ambitious in its attempts to satirize suburbia, male bonding, and self-help philosophy, and for the most part it does succeed in hitting its targets with a malicious, misanthropic glee. When five buddies arrive in Las Vegas for some pre-wedding shenanigans, things quickly spiral out of control when the requisite prostitute falls victim to a grisly accident, igniting a spark in an already unstable powder keg of personalities. Following the lead of real estate agent and self-help guy Robert (Christian Slater), the men warily agree on a cover-up and covert desert burial. A couple hours and another corpse later, however, they're already at each other's throats, and their escalating breakdowns threaten to disrupt the highly prized wedding of hard-as-nails bride Laura (a stunning Cameron Diaz). Berg, like most actor-turned-directors (this is The Last Seduction star's filmmaking debut) helms the film with a wildly sliding tone and tends to weigh its strengths heavily on its performers. Slater's psycho turn is by far his most inventive yet (he's more in control than ever before), Diaz effectively mixes sunshine with poison, and Jon Favreau is effective and understated as the hapless bridegroom; the rest of the cast, however, tends to play up the histrionics. Be warned, though: Those expecting a sunny-style There's Something About Mary gross-out comedy will probably be shocked by Berg's take-no-prisoners agenda; this is comedy at its absolute blackest, and no one is spared. --Mark Englehart
$19.99



It actually underscores the power and distinctiveness of Gary Cooper's movie stardom that this isn't so much a true collection as gleanings from the odds-and-ends table. That's not a knock; three of the four films are solid entertainments and would be well worth recommending on their own. But the only thing unifying them is the beauty and enigma Cooper brought to them, and the professionalism with which he addressed these wide-ranging assignments.

Three of them date from the '20s and '30s and were produced by Samuel Goldwyn. The 1926 silent The Winning of Barbara Worth gave Western stunt man and bit player Cooper his first featured role (by accident--the actor originally cast didn't report for work!). A cowboy whose visionary surveyor father aims to "redeem the desert and make it one fine garden," Cooper's character is the third corner of a romantic triangle, ordained by the Hollywood caste system to lose lifelong sweetheart Vilma Banky to engineer Ronald Colman. Colman has lots more screen time than Cooper and bears the moral-ethical brunt of the eco-conscious drama; he's also surprisingly persuasive wearing a sweat-stained Stetson and trading gunshots with the bad guys (if this were a sound film, Colman could never have gotten away with it). But the camera and the audience are locked onto Cooper whenever he's on screen. In longshot or vulnerable closeup, he's already one of the gods of the cinema. As for the movie, the quality of the print is excellent, its clarity intensified by bronze, yellow, and moonlit-blue tinting that often seems on the verge of resolving into full color. Director Henry King shows a good eye for action and bold vistas, and a visual adventurousness mostly absent from his later work.

Next up chronologically is The Cowboy and the Lady (1938), and the best thing about this misbegotten movie is Garson Kanin's description, in one of his Hollywood memoirs, of how Leo McCarey sold the idea for it to Sam Goldwyn. McCarey was, of course, a comedic master (recently Oscared for directing The Awful Truth), and his exuberant pitch convinced Goldwyn and his staffers that audiences would "piss" themselves laughing at this romantic comedy about a daughter of privilege (Merle Oberon) who falls for a rodeo rider (Cooper) and learns homespun values. Goldwyn paid McCarey off, assigned some writers to the script, then realized there was no real story--"no there there," as Gertrude Stein might have put it. The resultant unfunny and unromantic endeavor oozes bad faith from every pore, with neck-snapping life changes foisted on the hapless Cooper and Oberon from reel to reel, and excruciating scenes (jitterbugging in a drawing room, playing house back on Cooper's ranch) that strain charmlessly for McCarey's patented brand of fey. H.C. Potter directed, understandably without conviction.

We and Cooper are back on track with The Real Glory (1939). The reliable Henry Hathaway helmed this second cousin to his and Cooper's The Lives of a Bengal Lancer, with Cooper as an Army doctor assigned to the Philippine Constabulary on Mindanao in 1906. The movie was well-received when it came out; encountered in the shadow of the Iraq War, its tale of U.S. occupiers trying to help the local populace "stand up" against a fanatical and murderous insurgency takes on new fascination. There are some amazing passages--two horrendous murders by bolo knife--and the final battle sequence puts the CGI-riddled action films of the present day to shame. But the most impressive element is Cooper, and we can't improve on the verdict of that astute film critic Graham Greene: "Mr. Cooper ... has never acted better.... Watch him inoculate [Andrea King] against cholera--the casual jab of the needle, and the dressing slapped on while he talks, as though a thousand arms had taught him where to stab and he doesn't have to think any more."

For the final film in the set we jump into the '50s--the century's and Cooper's. Vera Cruz (1954) casts him as a former Confederate officer who's ridden into Emperor Maximilian's Mexico, hoping to make a fortune in the new civil war south of the border so that he can rebuild his own devastated homeland. Costar Burt Lancaster (whose company Hecht-Lancaster was producing) plays another mercenary, a real sociopath, and it's fascinating to watch these two stellar icons of very different Hollywood eras make common cause--Lancaster at the height of his grinning-predator mode, Cooper an aging knight whose aim is still true. Director Robert Aldrich keeps finding dynamic uses for the SuperScope format and flavorfully fills it with sublime uglies like Ernest Borgnine, Jack Elam, Charles Horvath, Jack Lambert, and Charles Buchinsky-about-to-become-Bronson. Pieces of this movie found their way into the dreams of Sam Peckinpah and Sergio Leone. --Richard T. Jameson


by Will Pearson, Mangesh Hattikudur, Elizabeth Hunt
$10.17

Average customer rating: 4.0 ISBN: 0060568062

by Gordon Livingston, Elizabeth Edwards
$12.24

Average customer rating: 4.5 ISBN: 1569244197

by Henry C. Lee, Jerry Labriola
$16.32

Average customer rating: 3.0 ISBN: 1591024099
$14.99



She was famous as both artist and model, infamous as political revolutionary and social libertine, and Frida Kahlo's controversial life couldn't help but seem the stuff of great musical theater. Her story is brought to the screen by director Julie Taymor, whose musical compatriot here is also her husband; Elliot Goldenthal, student of both Copland and Corigliani, shrewdly sublimates his modernism in service of the rich, evocative music and songs of Mexico and Central America. Utilizing performers that range from the contemporary (Lila Downs) to the folk-classic (Costa Rican legend Chavela Vargas; Brazilian star Caetano Veloso) and traditional (Los Cojolites, El Poder Del Norte, Trio Huasteca, Caimanes de Tanquin, and others), Goldenthal generously displays the true breadth of Mexican folk music, while seamlessly infusing it with the minimalist corners of his own underscore and some winning songwriting of his own. The result is one of 2002's most compelling soundtracks. The enhanced CD features include musical film excerpts, as well as a video conversation between Goldenthal and star Salma Hayek and text interviews with the composer and director Taymor. --Jerry McCulley
$11.98



This is a downbeat and brainy set of mostly instrumental tracks from the likes of Kronos Quartet, ECM guitarist Terje Rypdal, guitarist Michael Brook, and Lisa (Dead Can Dance) Gerrard. Highlights include "Always Forever Now" by Passengers (Brian Eno, U2), and Moby's mordant cover of Joy Division's "New Dawn Fades." --Jeff Bateman
$10.99



With the soundtrack to Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood, O Brother, Where Art Thou? producer T Bone Burnett has compiled another gently nostalgic gem. Filled with covers of jazz standards, sparse blues picking, and traditional Cajun pieces, Sisterhood matches Brother in ambiance and impeccable musicianship. The highlights are numerous: Bob Dylan's lively song waltzes with a raspy narrative, Lauryn Hill uses acoustic plucking to complement her soulful croon, and Bob Schneider contributes an understated love-ballad rumbling with piano. Even the cover songs are first-rate; Macy Gray jive-jumps through a faithful Billie Holiday cover, and Tony Bennett slows things down with a dapper and distinguished Nat "King" Cole homage. Despite the diffuse genres covered, the superior quality of Sisterhood's songs renders these differences negligible, and the album's pacing ensures a pleasing alternation of styles that never lags. In fact, there's nary a bad song on the entire album. The divine secret's out--Sisterhood is an essential listen. --Annie Zaleski



Shopping  Created at Sun Nov 23 01:23:44 2008